Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +4 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

18 Tips For Writing Engaging Headlines and 27 Makeovers That Saved Stories From Extinction - MediaShift

18 Tips For Writing Engaging Headlines and 27 Makeovers That Saved Stories From Extinction - MediaShift | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
Online, your product is unbundled. You get 10 words. Or 8. Or maybe 13, like I used above, to market your work. Digital success is like selling a newspaper story by story rather than day by day or week by week. And in selling that day’s paper, by subscription or newsstand, there’s just less urgency to make the headline awesome on that 150-word story buried at the bottom of page 11. Sections and geographic centers all are comfortable assumptions you can’t make in digital headlines. You must have a certain sense of desperation in writing web headlines, like those eight words are the difference between that column’s or blog’s life or death. Mostly, because it is. You aren’t owed readership. Your headline helps earn it — along with a handful of other factors like author and brand.


So any strategy involving growing and sustaining digital audience must incorporate excellence in headline writing. Must.
A few points to clarify here as we begin. I’ll be discussing writing for readers here, not for search engine optimization. That will be a consideration at times, but mostly we’re talking about people creating headlines for people....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Chicago Tribune's deputy digital news editor Kurt Gessler will wow you with his writing tips. His headline makeovers are superb. Highly recommended for all writers. 10/10

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

How Have The Media Times Changed? The 'AP Stylebook' Knows

How Have The Media Times Changed? The 'AP Stylebook' Knows | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

In 1977, according to the AP style guide I still occasionally refer to, using the acronym “TV” as a noun when writing about television was not advised.

“Acceptable as an adjective or in such constructions as cable TV [italics theirs]. But do not normally use as a noun unless part of a quotation,” counsels the item on “TV” in the 1977 edition of the AP Stylebook -- formerly titled “The Associated Press Stylebook and Libel Manual.”

Today we use “TV” and “television” more or less interchangeably as nouns, although the former is probably used more now than the latter. One thing the 1977 Stylebook reveals, however, is that “media” -- whether electronic or otherwise -- was not nearly the obsession for news organizations that it is today.

Part of the reason was that the world at large was not nearly as obsessed with media and technology -- and the companies responsible for them -- as we are now. There was so much less of it then too, obviously....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Adam Buckman looks back at the 1977 AP Stylebook and reminds us how times have changed. Fun read.

El Monóculo's curator insight, November 18, 2016 5:25 PM

Adam Buckman looks back at the 1977 AP Stylebook and reminds us how times have changed. Fun read.

Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

These Five Astonishing Headline Writing Secrets Will Make You Cry, Or At Least Click | Forbes

These Five Astonishing Headline Writing Secrets Will Make You Cry, Or At Least Click | Forbes | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
You'll never believe Peter Koechley's OUTRAGEOUS headline writing tips.
For most of us in the online journalism business, writing headlines basically amounts to guesswork. Will people click on this? Are there enough nouns in here for Google to find it? Does this line break look weird? Should I use a question mark? An exclamation point?
For Upworthy, it’s more akin to a science — and not one of those mushy sciences like anthropology or psychology, either. We’re talking straight-up particle physics.
For every article they publish, its writers come up with 25 headline options. They then A/B test the four most promising before settling on a winner. 

The result: In just 11 months, with a smallish staff and not much original content, Upworthy has built a sizable audience (8.7 million monthly unique visitors as of last November) for its socially progressive message, plus a Facebook following of more than 1 million fans....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Forget page view journalism. Learn how Upworthy applies science to the art of headline writing. Five headline tips that will have your content rocking and rolling.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Google is funding an automatic fact checking bot

Google is funding an automatic fact checking bot | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Google has agreed to fund a project to develop automated fact checking tools amid anger over the prevalent of fake news websites during the US presidential election.

UK fact checking organisation, FullFact, has announced it has been awarded €50,000  (£43,000) by the tech giant’s Digital News Initiative to build the first  “fully automated end-to-end fact checking system”.

In a statement, FullFact explained that the system will have two main features. 

One will inform readers if something reported as fact has already been proven inaccurate.

The other mode will fact check claims automatically using Natural Language Processing and statistical analysis in real-time – something FullFact said has never been done before – by highlighting the text and having a factbox appear when the user hovers over it....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

We desperately need fact checking in this fake news, US post-election, political Twilight Zone. I'm not sure a bot can do it all but kudos to Google for trying and good luck to FullFact. What do you say Facebook?

Com.it's curator insight, November 18, 2016 5:47 PM
Google ha accedido a crear un proyecto que desarrolle un método para validar los hechos, y así poder detectar noticias falsas. 
EL OBSERVATORIO DIGITAL's curator insight, November 20, 2016 5:03 PM
Google accede a crear un método para validar los hechos y detectar falsas noticias.

Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

BBC makes its training resources free to the public in 11 languages

BBC makes its training resources free to the public in 11 languages | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

If you're in the market for a free journalism education, hundreds of training materials are now at your disposal.If you're in the market for a free journalism education, hundreds of training materials are now at your disposal.


The BBC's College of Journalism made a slew of videos and guides - initially created to train its own journalists - available to reporters worldwide for free.You can watch videos and tutorials made by BBC journalists in the field on journalists' safety, social media,  multimedia  techniques, as well as subject and writing style guides galore. Check out the whole library here....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Awesome writing resource, free for the next 12 months. Maybe they'll extend that in the future?

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Major papers’ longform meltdown

Major papers’ longform meltdown | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

...So, all in all, it’s more than instructive to check in on longform newspaper writing, and the start of a new year isn’t a bad time to do it.

 

And it’s pretty to shocking to see what’s become of the time-honored form since the newspaper industry’s great unraveling started a decade ago.

 

The Los Angeles Times, for instance, published 256 stories longer than 2,000 words last year, compared to 1,776 in 2003—a drop of 86 percent, according to searches of the Factiva database. The Washington Post published 1,378 stories over 2,000 words last year, about half as many as 2003 when it published 2,755. The Wall Street Journal, which pioneered the longform narrative in American newspapers, published 35 percent fewer stories over 2,000 words last year from a decade ago, 468 from 721.

 

When it comes to stories longer than 3,000 words, the three papers showed even sharper declines. The WSJ’s total is down 70 percent to 25 stories, from 87 a decade ago, and the LA Times down fully 90 percent to 34 from 368....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

This is a really interesting analysis of newspaper content and trends. Despite some push back in a few newspapers and magazines and several new online journals, the trend is clear.

No comment yet.