Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.4K views | +2 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

An Infographic Look At The Fake Brands That Connect Your Favorite Movies And TV Shows

An Infographic Look At The Fake Brands That Connect Your Favorite Movies And TV Shows | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Shared universes. They're so hot right now. Long before the deep bench of Marvel superheroes started jumping into each other's movies, however, there was something else that united the far-flung worlds of many different movies and shows: fake brands.

Call it product displacement. When the producers of a movie or TV show prefer not to shell out money to get a real brand onscreen, they opt for the unreal.


Marlboro-lookalike, Morley Cigarettes has been tarring the arteries of fictional characters for years, while the preferred chip of cinematic snackers is often Let's. It turns out, however, that many more movies and shows share the same fake brands than one might expect. British-based freelance hub fivesquid has just released an infographic about this phenomenon that shows which brands and products indirectly fueled some unlikely crossovers.

Some are obvious. Anyone who's seen a Quentin Tarantino movie, for instance, knows that Big Kahuna Burger is a thread throughout the self-contained Tarantino-verse. It should come as something of a reality-testing surprise, however, to see the same beer brand appear in both Star Trek and Brooklyn Nine-Nine. I mean, come on: The U.S.S. Enterprise would have its own microbrew, for sure. Weird that this is the first thing that's ever been unrealistic about Star Trek.

Have a look at the other fake brands in movies and shows in the infographic below....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Here's the best of the fake TV brands you may remember. Fun!

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

James Bond, Dunder Mifflin, and the Future of Product Placement

James Bond, Dunder Mifflin, and the Future of Product Placement | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

This is a fundamental shift not only for the TV channels, which will have to completely rethink their revenue model, but also for brands, which find it incredibly, and increasingly, difficult to capture the attention of empowered, impatient consumers.


An obvious solution is product placement, a company paying for its product to be featured prominently in a film or television program as a form of advertising. According to PQMedia, the U.S. product placement market grew by 12.8% in 2014, to over $6 billion, and is set to reach over $11 billion by 2019.


The trouble is that the huge success of product placement is causing a dip in its credibility and effectiveness as a marketing channel. Audiences are increasingly skeptical. Research by Eva A. van Reijmersdal of the University of Amsterdam suggests that when product placement becomes too prominent, it affects attitudes negatively because viewers become aware of a deliberate selling attempt.


Product placement can also lower audiences’ evaluations of the focal entertainment product (the film or the show), as recently demonstrated by Andre Marchand and colleagues. And it’s particularly true when audiences like the film or show....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

The search for an alternative to interruptive ads - brought to you by me! ;-)

No comment yet.