Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.4K views | +0 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

How Jake Tapper’s Performative Neutrality Made Him the Ideal Newsman for Our Age

How Jake Tapper’s Performative Neutrality Made Him the Ideal Newsman for Our Age | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

This past Thursday, an eternity in Trump time, Jake Tapper began his daily CNN show The Lead by addressing Donald Trump’s untermensch Steve Bannon’s recent comments that the media ought to “keep its mouth shut.” With disdain in his eyes and a sneering smile on his face, Tapper succinctly responded, “No”—a no swiftly shared around social media.

 

Jake Tapper, CNN’s chief Washington correspondent, has been a journalist for nearly 20 years, during which time he has earned a reputation as a hard-nosed newsman and equal-opportunity tough interviewer. But he has only started going viral recently. Tapper become the host of The Lead and CNN’s Sunday morning news show State of the Nation without parroting the most popular anchor modes of our time, the righteously or satirically partisan talking head. Unlike Bill O’Reilly, Megyn Kelly, Sean Hannity, Rachel Maddow, Chris Hayes, or even CNN’s rising star Van Jones—whose show, The Messy Truth, is now CNN’s most-watched—Tapper has built his brand on a kind of performative neutrality: an old-school news anchor refashioned for the present day.

 

While there are certainly people, Trump among them, who reflexively scoff at the notion of CNN’s nonpartisanship, it is still the only cable news network with notable segments of its audience that voted for Trump or for Hillary Clinton. Channeling the ethos of his network, Tapper is combative less about party than the “truth.” A notorious bulldog for answers, he methodically rephrases questions over and over again until he gets, or doesn’t get, a response, as when he asked Trump if his comments on Judge Gonzalo Curiel were racist—23 times....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Good profile of CNN's Jake Tapper.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

The Most Engaging Stories, According to Chartbeat - MediaShift

The Most Engaging Stories, According to Chartbeat - MediaShift | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

How do you measure a year in news? 2016 brought political earthquakes in the U.S. and Britain. Police shootings and terror attacks were recorded on cell phones. In pop culture, we collectively mourned for Prince and Carrie Fisher, gaped in astonishment at Sean Penn’s gonzo interview of El Chapo, and celebrated human achievement at the Rio Olympics. Reporters turned these events into stories that drew the attention of millions of readers.


A new report out this week from web analytics firm Chartbeat reveals the best of the best — “the stories that defined the breadth, the depth, and the power of journalism in 2016” — drawing on data from more than 50,000 media sites around the world.


How does one story stand out in a sea of content? It has to be outstanding journalism.


The 102 stories on the list had the most total engaged time — how long online visitors spent actively reading — of all the stories that Chartbeat measured. In total, they commanded 2.5 billion engaged minutes, or almost five millennia of the world’s collective attention.


Not surprisingly, the list is dominated by politics, with Nate Silver’s Election Forecast at the top. The top breaking news story is CNN’s coverage of the Orlando nightclub shooting in June. Sports, opinion and entertainment make the list as well....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Chartbeat shares the most -shared stories of 2016 and the numbers are 'uge.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

We broke the Panama Papers story. Here's how to investigate Donald Trump

We broke the Panama Papers story. Here's how to investigate Donald Trump | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Donald Trump is now president. This challenges many of us, not least members of the press.


Countless reporters are still shaken and stunned by how he singled out a CNN reporter, one of the most respected news outlets in the world, to attack and humiliate him during his first press conference since winning the elections. Worryingly, none of his fellow journalists in the room stood up for him at the time.


This wasn’t Trump’s first attack on the press, and it certainly won’t be his last. The first White House press briefing, held on Saturday, featured bullying, threats and unproven claims. That is why a new level of solidarity and cooperation is needed among the fourth estate. 


American journalists should stop him from dividing their ranks – however hard their professional competition may be. They should do the opposite: unite, share and collaborate. Even if doing so would mean embracing something quite unfamiliar and new to American journalism....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Now it is time for the media to join forces once again – especially given the threat Trump poses

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Trump Stories Get the Lion's Share of Engagement Online - MediaShift

Trump Stories Get the Lion's Share of Engagement Online - MediaShift | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Back in June, I talked with Parse.ly data analyst Conrad Lee about why stories about Donald Trump weren’t attracting the same audience online as they were on television. At the time, based on data from more than 100,000 news articles from 300 newsrooms, it looked as if Trump stories were actually less popular than stories about other candidates, including Hillary Clinton. This was before the convention and the formal nomination of both candidates of course.


Lee took an another look at the data last week and found that things have shifted. Trump still receives the lion's share of articles, even from publishers that are left-leaning.


Today the data show that Trump stories get more page views than stories about Clinton do. Both the overall number of stories and page views per post peaked around the conventions in late July, before dipping again in August.


Lee makes no distinction between positive and negative stories. Both candidates have been the subject of intense reporting in recent weeks. But this is an interesting set of data nonetheless as we think about the proper role of journalists going into the first debate next week, when 75 percent of voters plan to tune in....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Here's an interesting media analysis of coverage of Trump and Clinton.

No comment yet.