Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +0 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

This free online encyclopedia has achieved what Wikipedia can only dream of

This free online encyclopedia has achieved what Wikipedia can only dream of | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
The internet is an information landfill. Somewhere in it—buried under piles of opinion, speculation, and misinformation—is virtually all of human knowledge.
 
The story of the SEP shows that it is possible to create a less trashy internet.
 
But sorting through the trash is difficult work. Even when you have something you think is valuable, it often turns out to be a cheap knock-off.


The story of how the SEP is run, and how it came to be, shows that it is possible to create a less trashy internet—or at least a less trashy corner of it. A place where actual knowledge is sorted into a neat, separate pile instead of being thrown into the landfill. Where the world can go to learn everything that we know to be true. Something that would make humans a lot smarter than the internet we have today....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Delightful and thoughtful reading about an alternative to Wikipedia. highly recommended. 10/10

ramon gutierrez sanchez's curator insight, December 18, 2015 11:44 AM

Delightful and thoughtful reading about an alternative to Wikipedia. highly recommended. 10/10

Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Who Killed Wikipedia?

Who Killed Wikipedia? | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

A hardened corps of volunteer editors is the only force protecting Wikipedia. They might also be killing it.

Wikipedia is the sixth most popular website in the world. It’s the quickest way to get the lowdown on the Battle of Nashville, find out exactly how old Ruth Bader Ginsburg is, or discover who invented Hot Pockets. You can find more authoritative specialized resources online—from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy to IMDb— but nothing is as comprehensive. The English-language edition, the largest of Wikipedia’s 287 language editions, now includes more than 4.5 million entries, and 11 other editions have more than a million each.

Few of the tens of millions of readers who rely on Wikipedia give much thought to where its content comes from or why the site, which is crowdsourced and open (at least in theory) for anyone to edit, doesn’t degenerate into gibberish and graffiti. Like Google or running water, it is simply there. Yet its very existence is something of a miracle. Despite its ocean of content, this vital piece of informational infrastructure is the work of a surprisingly small community of volunteers. Only about 3,000 editors contribute more than 100 changes a month to the English-language Wikipedia, down from a high of more than 4,700 in early 2007. Without any central direction or outside recognition, these dedicated amateurs create, refine, and maintain millions of content pages....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

The wonder and potential woe of Wikipedia.

Marco Favero's curator insight, November 17, 2014 3:24 PM

aggiungi la tua intuizione ...

Leonard Waks's curator insight, November 17, 2014 4:33 PM

The take-away: the top editors do not trust the newbies, and are likely to eliminate any new edit in a matter of seconds. New and more obscure rules emerge. The once flexible giant is getting arthritic.